Author: claymanley

I have had some thoughts about how I’d like this game to be played.

First, some changes to the board. I modified the board to have larger neighborhoods, which by effect made less individual areas but increased the amount of playable space. I think that allowing more of anything to be played in a given spot is more fun. For example, I tried to limit the amount of blank space that can only accommodate a four long game piece because it doesn’t really allow for any choice besides color.

I also removed the animated people moving about the streets. I thought it was a cool use of the display but several people were confused as to what they represented and since it was only cosmetic, I didn’t feel the need to keep them for this version.

I also rebalanced some of the pieces. I wanted more pieces that had parking in the center of the piece, or rather fewer pieces that had it on an edge. The thinking with this was that it is a little too easy to stack pieces when only the very edge gets disallowed after each play.

Lastly, I want to limit which spaces that can be played in to only allow three neighborhoods to be played in at a given time. By only allowing development in a new space once there are no legal moves left in the other areas, players are forced to confront the dwindling space and it also visualizes the sprawl across the space over time.

Below is a video of me playing through a full board with these changes in effect.

Due to the nature of my game, many different people would be interacting with it so my goal with these rules was to have something very simple that people could easily partake in. This is the version of the rules that was posted in the gallery and tested during the senior showcase opening:

Objective – Create new development and re-develop existing space

Materials – Pick 3 development pieces of any shape and color

Play your turn – You may play pieces anywhere you would like, including on top of other developments, except:

1. You can’t play on top of that same color

2. You can’t play on top of a grey parking space

The Game Ends when – There is no space left that can be developed

ARGs: A World Without Oil

This was brought up in another class (maybe 4D?). This is an interesting concept and I think that anything that challenges people to change their daily habits and reflect is probably a good thing, although I am still not sold on the “game-ness” of this. The open source narrative could maybe be viewed through a documentary lens but since this existed in the thoughts of people who participated and made videos and posts, it’s harder for me to view it as a game.

Discovery Tour by Assassin’s Creed

I am highly skeptical about this being a game for change. I guess I should say that I am cynical of Ubisoft as a company and anything that they make. I struggle to see this reuse of game assets as anything other than an advertisement for the Assassin’s Creed games; something that I have very little interest in to begin with.

Detroit Become Human

I recall when this game got really big on YouTube with lots of people doing Let’s Plays although I never got invested in it. I think my assumption at the time was that it was along the lines of iRobot. I wasn’t aware of there being a deeper message to be attained and I am a little skeptical of games that claim to have branching paths depending on your decisions because I feel like the choices that you make don’t always actually do anything to change the outcomes. I would be open to playing this game now and I am glad that I managed to avoid spoilers for it.

Factorio

I am familiar with Factorio for its addictive gameplay although I never considered it as a game for change. With something such as Minecraft, it is assumed that you as the player will change the environment that you’re in and there isn’t really anything to dissuade you against doing this since that is the core mechanic of the game. It is honestly really smart to have the player in Factorio consider the effects of their exploitation of resources.

Outer wilds

This game is on my wishlist; it looks so good. I love the Majora’s Mask type time mechanic and the world looks really beautiful. I suppose I will have to play it to better understand how this incorporates the idea of empathy but I imagine it is somewhere along the lines of how Celeste handled the idea of mental illness.

Gris

The visuals of this game definitely interest me. I love a good 2D platformer although it isn’t totally clear to me from the trailer what abilities you have as the player. I just mentioned Celeste as a game that has a focus on mental illness, but the main reason that I love that game is because of the movement. The entire process of playing through the game is improving your technical skills and by the end, you can practically dance through the world. I would hope that Gris is similar to this although it looks to be a much slower pace.

Gone Home

I really like this idea of discovering a story through bits of the game environment. The screenshots have the look of a horror game like something from Resident Evil so I was surprised to learn that there is such a strong emphasis on the characters and their relationships in this. I suppose it is thematically correct to have a sad game set in an old dark house.

The Layoff Game

The outrage that this game received is exactly what I think the creators were going for when they made it. It is comical to see the disconnect between people who just don’t “get it”. The gameplay of a match three game is nothing new but changing the theme to be about executives consolidating employees positions gives it an entirely new meaning.

Dumb Ways to Die

When I was growing up, I would play this original game on an iPad at a friend’s house. We had probably put about 10 hours all together into playing all of the mini games before finding a link to the song and realizing it was a PSA about train safety. I can clearly remember being surprised at this. We were just taking turns playing the game because it was fun. Now THAT is how you do a game for change!

Fake it to Make it

I don’t think we played enough of this game to really grasp all of the gameplay. I couldn’t totally tell how different fake news stories that we could create had different impacts on our stats although I suppose the point was already made. It was easy to just publish a bunch of garbage fake stuff and the more outrageous stuff got more traction. I am not sure how many people would play this game who are not already in tune with this issue however.

Cards Against Calamity

I wasn’t crazy about this game. The trade off that the game asked us as the players to make sometimes seemed inconsequential and other times were very harsh. It was never clear what the value of a resource was going to be and even after playing a few times through, there was too much randomness for my liking.

Cast Your Vote

I REALLY did not like this one. I can’t imagine anyone playing this willingly or having fun doing so. I do somewhat understand staying away from actual named political parties since you wouldn’t want to be seen as trying to indoctrinate kids but it just seems silly to ignore the fact that this is not how politics actually works.

Pepsi Man

This game is notorious, I think I first found out about this game in middle school. It has a cult meme following, especially since the song is unironically kind of catchy. I don’t think it would be a stretch to say that these memes actually improved my perception of the brand. Although this was likely not the intended avenue for this to happen, it is interesting that it had the intended result. They used the wrong formula and got to the right solution.

Sneak King

I never owned an Xbox but if I did and was aware of this promotional game, I probably would have gotten it. As a kid, I bought lots of Cheerios cereal because there were pamphlets with chapters of the second Spiderwick Chronicles book in the boxes. I eventually got all of them and compiled them into the complete book which I thought was pretty cool. When Sneak King came out, I was six years old and my access to games was limited to pretty much whatever I could find for cheap. I would have definitely been in the target market for this advergame.

Chex Quest

This reminded me of all of the different versions of Doom that I have played. In middle school, I would play it on a calculator. This is all to say that I would play whatever I could get my hands on and Chex Quest looks to be far from the worst advergame that one could pick out.

M&M Kart Racing

This is not one that I have ever played, and from the looks of it, no one should ever play it. In hindsight, I don’t think that I ever had any truly bad advergames although I did have some games that were just rip offs of other more successful games that had characters from TV put into them.

America’s Army

Every FPS game I’ve ever known has to be compared to the gold standard: Counter Strike. CS was released several years before AA and in my opinion outclasses it mechanically and in terms of strategy. As a game, I see no reason that someone would choose AA. I don’t doubt that CS also had an effect on recruitment amongst young men when it was released and even today.

Vote!!!

This is a silly looking game, but amongst the ones that we discussed, probably the most compelling in terms of persuading me in any given direction. The creators clearly understood how to appeal to a young demographic.

Darfur is Dying

This is just a smart choice for something to pick as a game for change. Every time that I watch Hotel Rwanda, I feel empathy for everyone in that situation, and wish that I could help. It makes a lot of sense to develop this global issue into an interactive thing.

The McDonalds Game

I think this is pretty clever, although I also feel that I’m pretty aware of all of the ethical issues surrounding eating at McDonalds and I don’t think that this game swayed me in any way. I really just didn’t want to read the text parts of this game. I figured most of it out through trial and error and pretty quickly got a Game Over. I played a few more times and still didn’t bother to play “right”. My assumption was that it probably eventually ends in a loss since it is showing an unsustainable business growth model.

Monopoly

I had heard on John Green’s podcast about the original version of the Monopoly rules and the ironic history of the IP being stolen by a corporation and the rules changed to what they are today. The rules variant that we played in class was even less fun than the retail version of the game. I got the gist of what it was going for just by skimming the rules sheet and really didn’t feel the need to play much of it. One thing that happened with our playthrough was that since it was clear before we started who the winner would be, we each had different expectations of the play.

Painstation

This is not what I imagined when it was first brought up but it honestly makes a lot of sense. What better way to establish stakes for the game than putting your body on the line. People generally care about winning trivial games just for bragging rights so having a negative consequence for losing is a natural next step to engage people. You can be sure that anyone participating with this game is giving it their full attention.

Getting Over It

I have seen many people play this although I never ventured to try it myself (I’ve only played Mario Maker levels that are derivative of it). My understanding is that the controls are frustrating to pick up and it is easy to lose all of your progress and go back to the start. Because it is so difficult and annoying to progress in this game, the developer has made a final reward that is prefaced with a warning saying that people who are streaming shouldn’t show and spoil it for people who didn’t earn it themselves. Although I’m sure it is possible to find what is behind this wall somewhere online, I have always held off in case I do eventually decide to play it. I also remember that there is an unlockable golden pot for beating the game 100 times which sounds like an impossible amount considering that most people probably never even beat the game once. It is worth noting, however, that this game, like many others, quickly developed a community of people who like to speedrun it. This is especially impressive given the difficulty of the controls but obviously some people find it rewarding to play.

Calvin Ball

I grew up reading Calvin and Hobbes but I had never even considered trying to play it in real life before. I think that we as a class struggled with this because we are used to having clear rules set out for us. People had a natural inclination to want to fall into patterns of repeating what they were doing. It is admittedly difficult to rewire your brain to not do something twice.

Cow Clicker

This struck me as being pretty clever. The twist of irony that people came to play the parody game of the whole clicker genre is such a good narrative. I also think that the art for some of the cows is pretty creative. I won’t say that I am above playing a clicker game ever in my life, although I do think that after you’ve been invested in one, it is hard to want to play another. If Cow Clicker was the first one that I had ever stumbled upon, I can definitely see the appeal.

The Graveyard

I was previously familiar with this game because it had some popularity with some content creators when I was probably in high school. I think that by virtue of being something sold on Steam and that has semi realistic graphics, people have certain expectations of what the experience will be like. This made for some good gag videos of people who would go into the experience blind and be surprised that it is pretty limited in terms of what you can do in the game world. I do think that this still falls into the category of games because there is still player input and I honestly don’t think I knew that there were different endings that you could achieve.

Townscaper

I am surprised that I had never heard of this one before because it seems right up my alley. The animation of adding new things and having the existing structure adapt to it is so satisfying to watch. I could easily see myself spending a long time playing with this even though there isn’t a specific goal that you have to work towards.

On April 11, I had the first at-scale test of my game idea. I use the term “game” lightly. This was more of a non-objective experience. My goal with this experience was to engage gallery goers and challenge them to consider the effects of parking minimums by making them be the ones to create the issue themselves. Timelapse: (I will likely reframe this video to focus attention straight down on the board but I had some trouble with the Premiere plugin) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWzSKgk6lwQ
The inspirations for this experience were many. I liked the idea of having many players sharing the space of the game board with their moves affecting future play. This reminded me of an experiment that Reddit has done twice on April fools day, once in 2017, and again five years later in 2022. This is r/place, a huge canvas where every user of the website was allowed to place a single pixel every set amount of time (I think it was 10 minutes). Very quickly communities organized to create larger artworks that would not be possible with only an individual’s ability. There was also a sense of limited space and several works came at the expense of other existing ones, similar to graffiti on a wall. I liked this idea of overwriting existing spaces.
I wanted the rules to be easily digestible because it is difficult for people to understand a new game, especially if they were only going to be “playing” for a few minutes and knew that they likely would never have to play again. Any kind of in depth system would work to deter players. In the end, the rules page was one page of a few clearly bulleted points and I summarized these verbally for many players (although a couple of people still struggled to understand the rules).
I looked at Blokus for its system of deploying tile pieces through touching the corners of the same color pieces. This achieves an even distribution of colors because it doesn’t allow for two pieces of the same color to touch sides. However, later in the game as the board fills up, players are forced to use smaller and smaller pieces which didn’t fit as well with my model of having many different players. I also looked at Tetris, which in my opinion is one of the finest games ever created. The “tet” of the game’s name implies that every piece consists of 4 tiles which I liked a lot. Limiting the number of spaces on a piece also allowed for more interesting shapes to be created. It’s not possible to create different multiple shapes out of three or less touching triangles, but four would allow for a few interesting permutations of layouts.
An earlier version of my game had parking spaces disconnected from the development pieces. This allowed players to designate one area of the board as a massive parking lot, which is interesting in its own right, but I didn’t think would be as engaging to play. I considered having a requirement that the parking was built adjacent to the development or perhaps just in the same neighborhood area. By integrating the spaces into each piece, I feel that the problem of having players responsible for placing their own parking wherever they want was solved. This also removed a huge barrier to entry from the original idea which was to have players reference a spreadsheet to determine how much parking was to be built. This was in line with reality and would make people who did choose to engage with it to maybe understand the issue to a greater depth, but I think may have also deterred people from engaging to begin with. It also made it easier for players to break the rules by just not building separate parking spaces.
Another observation was that when two parking spaces were built adjacent to each other, it made an area that was big enough to house one of the matchbox cars that I had placed on the board. I initially put the cars on the board to draw a stronger connection to the road play rug that I referenced in my write up but it was interesting to see what players did with them once left to their own devices. I think this allowed for a non-intended play experience that I’m glad people were able to _. This also seemed to appeal to some of the children in attendance, although in placing the height of the table at a comfortable height for adults, I didn’t account for it being accessible to people any shorter than Max.
https://forms.gle/orqd5S8aE8PmvxKR8
I placed a QR code on the board with the pieces that linked to a form to encourage any kind of written feedback. Knowing that people are unlikely to take the time to write a lot, I tweaked the usual playtest form from this class to have only two questions that allowed for extended response and one multiple choice question for any game. I also made all of the questions optional to allow someone to submit any feedback that they may want to write, even if they don’t want to respond to every question.
By nature of this layout, the longer that the game plays out, the fewer pieces will be able to be played. If players played “perfectly” to optimize the number of pieces played, it would be possible to cover the entire surface of the map in parking. This, however, calls into question what the players motivations are in the game. Is playing as many pieces as possible the main objective of the game? For example, Anne Marie chose to play exclusively green spaces. This shows that different players have different, potentially conflicting goals, and mirrors the real development of a shared city space. Everyone makes changes that leave a lasting impression on the space.
A change that I would make would be to limit the number of pieces that have parking available on the edge of the piece. The ones that have parking in the middle of the piece diminish the redevelopment that is possible and accelerate the pace of the game which allows for some more creative placement.
This experience had the desirable effect of engaging people in a topic that I think about often and enjoy spreading awareness of and I was able to gather some valuable verbal feedback. I had a good discussion with Michelle Patrick, and although she apparently found the game “difficult to play”, I think that at the stage she experienced it, that was kind of the point. We discussed potential changes that the school could make that would benefit the majority of students on campus. This in turn sparked another conversation on a following day about what other needs some students might have.
I think that in many ways, this test was a success. Some future changes that I would like to make are trying new board layouts, re-keyframing the animations on the projection, and trying some tweaked rules such as limiting the areas that can be developed from virgin land to maybe three neighborhoods and only allowing spreading to a new space when there are no legal moves in the existing ones. This could serve to demonstrate the “sprawl” across the map as it fills up.