Was it fun? Yes, it was still fun despite it being very unfair
What were the player interactions? Players would land on each other’s properties and pay rent. In my case some of my opponents were paying me to buy properties for them since I would land on properties that they wanted.
How long did it take to learn? Did not take too long since it was the same as the original game with a few different rules per player.
Would you play it again? Yes, I would play it again
Analyze the game using the 3 act structure. 1 – Players roll the dice to see what character they get and they see what type of rules they have for that character. 2 – Players start to buy properties and collect rent when opponents land on their properties. 3- Players start to run out of money.
What are the collaborative and or competitive aspects of the game? Players exchange properties and compeate to collect the most properties and end up with the most money.
What is the game’s metaphor and which of the game’s mechanics standout? The game’s metaphor is that life isn’t always fair or equal. The rules for each character I thought were very unique because it made the tradional game a lot more challenging rather than just the simple boring game.
I also found this game to be enjoyable despite the unfairness. It has a great metaphor too
I agree with you. I really at first thought that the unfairness would bother me but I actually think it made it more fun.
Monopoly is fun, but it’s always a game that takes forever to finish. Especially when you are playing with a group of friends, it can take hours.
I usually don’t mind it taking forver tho.