Ames' syllabi

Making Process Pictures + Gameplay

Game Maker’s Play Test Notes

1. What questions did your players have?
   • Some common questions that the players had were based on the rules, such as “What if you pick up and put back items?” or “Can I take from the other player’s bin?” Any of the questions were based on unspecifications that I will have to clarify in the rules, in order to prevent people from doing the wrong actions. Another question was “Am I allowed to block the other player?”
2. How quickly did they learn to play?
   • It didn’t take long for the players to catch on to the ruleset. I’d say that this game has one of the easier rulesets I’ve made but nonetheless needs improvement. The players were able to play the game and adapt, but they still ran into complications that I will have to personally look over.
3. What kinds of interactions did the players have?
   • This is a very competitive game, and the players were constantly at each other’s throat. From a direct interaction, the players clash tweezers and wrestle with pieces time to time, as well as striving to the first to earn points. However, not much talking is involved in the game, as players are dialed in to focus on what pieces to grab.
4. What confused players?
   • Players were less confused about the rules, and more confused about the pieces they had to grab. I’ve noticed that in the prototype, I did not do a good job of indicating what type of pieces they have to lookout for. This confused the players, as they sometimes grabbed the wrong pieces or mistakened items for something else.
5. What made players excited?
   • The excitement mainly derived from the bulk of the gameplay, where players were rushing to earn points. When the points were earned, it was rewarding to the players too, complimenting their quick-thinking and observation skills. The anticipation of the manager flipping over the card evoked excitement as well, as the players eagerly awaited their next challenge.
6. What did your players enjoy doing?
   • The players enjoyed using the tools (tiny tweezers and shopping carts) and competing with each other. They enjoyed navigating through the miniature store model, which gave them an environment to interact with.
7. Did any aspect of the game frustrate players?
   • I wouldn’t say so, but the players suggested a mechanic to make things easier for the playing experience. I think it was more about a factor that they wish was a part of the game rather than frustration. For example, they suggested a clock/bell that could be hit to indicate that they are done with the shopping list, in order to prevent frequent ties.
8. What did your players learn/take away from your game? Was that what you intended?
   • I’d say my players learned the aspects of keeping cool during a moment of chaos. This game really enforces the principles of maintaining composure and concentration, no matter how stressful the environment may be. This was sort of what I intended, since I was looking to create a fast-paced and competitive game.
9. What is your plan to address player questions, confusion, and frustration?
   • Just as I’ve tackled criticism in the past, I plan on addressing the confusion, questions and frustrations of players through communication and/or feedback. Through frequent playtesting, I expect players to tell me the things that are wrong with my game. There have been instances where I thought the game was perfect from the start, until players have exposed its flaws in rules. I’ll also have to read over the rules of my game and make extra clarifications and changes to better the playing experience.
10. If your players didn’t get your intended message, what will you change?
    • One thing I will point out is that this game is supposed to make the players feel empathy, as the premise of the game revolves around getting groceries for your sick mother. I don’t think the players understood that, at least I can do a better job at making that known. In order to fix this, I will add designs to the cards which will show a small picture of your mother asking for the specific groceries. This way, players will be reminded of their sick mother, making them more determined.

Potential Rule Changes/Iterations

1. A needed change that I will have to make are little clarifications here and there in the rules. This includes rule changes such as:
   • No stealing from the other player
   • A restock session before each round by the manager
   • Something to do with picking back up items and putting it back on the shelves
   • No blocking players/no foul play
2. Additionally, I should probably make some design changes, or rather add some things that can make the playing experience more organized. This can include:
   • Redesign of the cards, making it so that players can understand which items to pick out
   • More shelves, different types of shelving for more interesting playing fields
   • A clock or a bell, so that the player finished with the shopping list can indicate clearly that they are finished
   • Design to the cards, with the mother on the face of the cards drawn

• what learning games have you played? can you categorize them by the theory of learning types: behaviorism, constructivism, constructivism or social nature? if you played more than one which was the most effective?
  • I don’t usually feel inclined to play any learning games, but one piece of content that stands out to me is cool math games, it had plenty of games that you could either learn real math from, or social interaction (i.e. papas pizzeria etc.) in all honesty those games taught me to work well in retail and that’s all
• is gamification bullshit, what is ian bogost’s argument and do you agree? where have you encountered it outside of class and what was your experience?
  • yes, I do believe gamification is bullshit, but too a limit, so many “bullshitters” use games as a means to spread their propaganda and profit off of it, usually I encounter new games when watching YouTubers play or I see it on PS Shop, but I tend to not play gamified content that isn’t really worth playing
• What is a serious game and why aren’t they chocolate covered broccoli?
  • A serious game is ment to educate, they aren’t chocolate covered because it isn’t meant to exactly be “fun”

Tester- Alana

Questions to consider during play and answer after play.

1.    What was the most frustrating moment or aspect of what you just played?

Not landing on a card space for many turns

2.    What was your favorite moment or aspect of what you just played?
Getting culture cards

3.    Was there anything you wanted to do that you couldn’t?

We couldn’t skip our turn when there was a group challenge so we implemented that even though it wasn’t in the rules.

4.    If you had a magic wand to wave, and you could change, add, or remove anything from the experience, what would it be?

Add

– who starts first in the rules,

– list of all countries or a list of the countries that start with a certain letter on the back of the group cards

– multiple choice?

– more cards

– penalty for repeated countries?

5.    What should be improved with the next version?

^^^

6.    What was the games message?

Geography education

7.    Describe the game in 3 words.

–       Advanced

–       Educational

–        

I have recently been playing the game Raft heavily, and at first I believed that it was a story about characters just trying to survive. But if you follow the story line then you can see that you are actually going and saving a whole town from a villain who locked all the people up, and terrorize them. You can personalize your raft so much and it is so much fun when you play it how you’re supposed to. 10/10 I highly recommend this game so much.

I really like this game. I remember watching this on YouTube a couple years ago when I watched markiplier play games. These collaborative games are really fun. This game is really stressful and requires a lot of clear communication. I played it with my friend today and there are a lot of complicated steps to each module. We played up to 2.2 “Double your money” and we got so much better at it throughout each bomb. The module with the two dots and the maze were the hardest for us because it takes a lot of visualization for the person with the manual, trying to guide the person with the bomb through the maze without hitting any lines. I also love that there is nothing repeated. When you fail and try again, nothing is the same as it was before. 10/10 game. Would highly recommend playing with a friend. Definitely worth the 10 dollar purchase.  

Suggestions: Make game start in the middle of the board

1. The most frustrating thing would probably be that when you start the game and you pull a backwards card, you can’t move anywhere
2. My favorite moment would be the interesting conversations that came out of the game!
3. I would love to see a more defined board
4. I really think it would take a while to reach the end of the game, I would like to see maybe a timer for the coversations maybe?
5. Putting the start in the middle
6. To talk about how the world has overconsumption
7. Unique, conversation starter, fun!

Rules:

Each player will start in a different quadrant, signified by the openings on the end of the maze.

Players will roll to see who goes first, highest number goes first, second highest goes second, etc.

Players will roll a single dice to determine how many spaces they move.

If a player rolls a 6, they get to place a wall piece to block off another players path.

If a player lands on a green dot space, you get a card to remove a wall that can be used once.

First person to the end of the maze wins the game, game can continue for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th.

This is my first prototype of Mindful Memorial Services’ card design and art style. I am not sure if I want to keep with the cartoony art style in future editions, but I definitely will be changing it. I’m open to any suggestions!