Responses to Readings
What Learning Games Have You Played? How Do They Fit Into Learning Theories?
Games teach in different ways. Typing Club uses repetition and rewards to build typing speed, but not deep thinking. Minecraft: Education Edition lets players learn by creating and problem-solving, needing some teacher guidance. Foldit uses teamwork for real science, but needs background knowledge. Minecraft is likely the best, as it encourages hands-on learning and problem-solving over simple repetition.
Is Gamification Bullshit? What is Ian Bogost’s Argument?
Bogost thinks gamification is a trick. Companies use points and badges to control people, not to make things fun or educational. They add game-like things to make people keep using their products, but without real value.
I agree. Things like Duolingo streaks and Starbucks rewards make people do things without really learning. But, some gamification, like Khan Academy’s, can be good if it’s used to help real learning. I’ve seen it myself: reward programs feel like marketing, and Duolingo focuses too much on streaks, not learning.
What is a Serious Game, and Why Aren’t They Chocolate-Covered Broccoli?
Serious games teach, not just entertain. Bad games try to hide learning, like boring math games. Good games teach through playing, like “Papers, Please.” Good games are fun by themselves. Gamification can be bad, but good for real learning. Learning games are best when players explore, create, and work together.
I agree that Minecraft Edu is the best in all categories for learning theories. It has a very adaptable experience that no matter how knowledgeable, or unaware – all players will enjoy themselves and learn STEM!