Category: Game Design Studio 2

Setup:

Pieces included: 1x Prisoner 3x Guards 1x Board

To set up the board, begin by placing the BLACK prisoner piece in the middle of the light blue 3×3 grid, that is where the prisoner will begin the game. Place the 3 guard pieces in the 3 red squares around the board. Before the game starts, players must decide which pieces they will be and can be decided amongst themselves, or with a single die.

Locations:

The light blue area is where the prisoner spawns into the game, guards may not enter the light blue area. The prisoner, though, is allowed to move one space diagonally rather than vertically and horizontally in the light blue area if he chooses to do so.

The grass area (courtyard) is a special area that can help the prisoner. Since this is an outside area, the prisoner may move one extra space if he chooses to do so. The guards cannot move any extra spaces inside of the courtyard and they continue to move normally. 

Playing the game:

Once the pieces are on the board, the prisoner will go first by moving either 1 or 2 spaces in any direction other than diagonal. The prisoner may only move in one direction though (EX: If you are moving right on the board 1 space, your second space must also be in that direction.

Once the prisoner has moved, each guard takes their turn moving 1 space in any direction (INCLUDING DIAGONAL). 

Goal: The goal is for the guards to intercept the prisoner before he leaves the prison on the top right of the board. Once the prisoner gets to the handcuff space, the prisoner wins the game and the guards lose (unless “No Man Left Behind” is called). If the guards get to the prisoner before he escapes, the guards win the game. 

The game will be played best 2 out of 3 rounds (or however many sequential rounds you would like to play). If the prisoner makes it to the exit space before the guards and he believes he can make it back to the starting space before the guards catch him, he may return to the starting place for a chance to win the entire game. This must be stated by calling out “No Man Left Behind”.

For the sake of the game not being impossible (which the point of the game is to make it extremely hard for the prisoner), guards may not enter the three surrounding spaces next to the handcuff space. 

Rules:

Each player will take turns going in a circle asking the group a Rock N’ Roll related question on the cards.

Players may decide who goes first, as it does not have an effect on game play.

Once a player asks the question, a 30 second timer will be set for the group to answer the question. If time runs out, the card will reward no points to anyone.

 If a player answers correctly, they will keep the card until the end of the round which will determine how many points they have.

The player with the most cards at the end of the round, will win. 

If a player answers a question wrong, another player can take the opportunity to steal the question for themselves. (Timer does not reset). If they do this and get it right, the player gets to take a card from their opponent. But if they attempt to steal and they get it wrong, the next player to steal the same question gets cards from both players who attempted to answer it. (This can stack to as many players that attempt to answer).

After further playing of my WW2 card game. The game is called the “Race to Freedom.” Really the only thing the testers told me was to add more turns and moveable cards. The turn aspect they said I gave them too little turns to win and they recommended it to increase from 15 turns to either 20 or 25. I went with 20 after playing a few more times. Really the only other thing would be to increase or decrease the amount of certain cards. The big one being the soldier cards. They all recommended more soldier cards to be added to make the game more realistic. So as of right now at least for this week. I changed the look and resized the cards to make it look better. Other than that they said it was an interesting game that they think is a good historic game.

Little update with the WW2 game:

The game I believe is going quite well. I had the first play through with my friends and they thought I highlighted the struggles pretty well. Its a little dark tbh though which is what bothers me because I put in “camps” which I am sure everyone can assume what that means. The way the players are supposed to view it when playing is to see the hardships the victims faced. The cards in the game consist of soldier interactions, events, rationing food and water, and more. You also have a certain number of turns to complete the game or else you and the other players lose/die. I tried to make the game purposely hard to truly show what these victims of war had to deal with.

So for the final I took quite a lot of audibles. I originally wanted to do a TTT card game but then decided to change the whole idea similar to the games off Games for a change. I decided to do a WW2 card game that highlights the struggles the victims faced to escape the war.

Scurry Ship (2 players)

Short Summary

The purpose of Scurry Ship is to remind players of the tragedy of the Titanic. In the final moments of the sinking ship, chaos erupts as tables and chairs slide and the boat breaks off into the water. People run towards the nearest life rafts, some saving themselves while others aren’t able to make it. Although Scurry Ship is fun, the hectic gameplay puts players in the shoes of a struggling survivor. During the gameplay, players must move the cubes around (tables) in order to escort their players to the other side. This will ensure that both people they control will be able to get into the life raft, winning the game and saving their lives.

Design Process & Thought Process

The first and most unique design aspect to the game is the water the boat sits on. There is a subtle elevation from the cardboard boat and the paper water, giving the effect that you are hopping off of the sinking boat and into the raft. I wanted the water to pop with colors of the ocean, showing a contrast between light and dark blues. Within the water, you can find the life raft your characters hop on. The life raft doesn’t sustain any special design element, but I wanted it to be 3-Dimensional instead of drawn in the water. This way, there is depth included in the playing experience, rather than interacting with a flat board.

Next, you can see how the boat breaks off. I cut the board to give the effect of the breakage, as pieces of the boat are damaged from the iceberg.

The board itself has a grid for each cube to sit on. This distinguishes the barrier of movement for the sliding tables and the character pieces. As you can see, some of the squares in the grid are gray, which represent holes on the ship. I added these holes because it was too easy to get to the other side of the board, and the holes slow players down. Nothing can go through or on top of these gray tiles. I made sure that the gray tile patterns remain the same on both sides, so one side doesn’t have any sort of advantage. Speaking of both sides, there is a clear barrier in the middle of the board, which separates both of the players’ boundaries.

And of course, I made sure to make the starting row for the characters green to indicate that it is the starting zone.

Lastly, the pattern cards have a simplistic design to them. I wanted to give them their own design, so I drew a symbol of someone dodging a sliding table.

Game Mechanics

The most notable game mechanic is the movement of your character piece. You can move up and down, side to side but not diagonal. The same logic applies to the tables that you have to slide around. I had to stress the correlation between my game and a slide puzzle in the rules. With the relation to a sliding puzzle, players can better understand how the movement works. This also branches into the mechanic of the gray holes in the ship, because you can’t go over or through the gray tiles.

The other game mechanic are the table pattern cards. These cards give a sense of randomness to the game, which can alter how players start their movement. Additionally, players are allowed to start on whatever green tile they want, but they can’t re-enter the starting zone.

Player Goals

The objective of the game is very straight forward, which is getting both character pieces to the end of the board. Getting to the end of the board is the challenge, in which there are many factors to consider during the playing experience. Just like a slide puzzle, players must shift both of their character pieces through the tables on the board, reaching the life raft. Players must also consider the holes in the middle of the board, which interrupt the movement of tables and characters alike. Making way through the chaos, when both of the character pieces reach the end, the player wins.

Gameplay Sequence

One of the players reached the life raft at the end. They still had another character piece to get in, so they still had work to do. You can see the progression across the board of both player’s character pieces.

Game Board & Components

There are a ton of grids for the cubes and character pieces to move around on. Again, you have to compare this game to a giant slide puzzle, as each cube is to be moved around the board. Players will constantly be interacting with the pieces and board components, leading to victory.

Here are the character pieces that need to be brought to the end of the board. Player one has red and gold, whereas player two has blue and silver characters. The pieces differ between the cubes and the characters. The cubes represent the tables, and the characters represent the civilians running to the life raft.

Rulebook & Playtesting

Playtesting Notes

1. What questions did your players have?
   • One of the questions players asked was about the gray tiles. I specified the mechanics of the gray tiles in the rules, but I realize that this is something that I can make more noticeable/clarified. It could have been easily overlooked, causing confusion. The next question that a player asked was how you are supposed to win. More specifically, what the win indicator is. I noticed that some players didn’t know what to do once they reached the end of the board, leaving them to question if they have won. Along with the win indication, a player asked if both characters had to be on the end in order to win.
2. How quickly did they learn to play?
   • Compared to my other games, this one took a bit of time for players to get used to. Players had to get used to the slide puzzle mechanic, which took a game or two for them to be fully comfortable. One player tried to jump over the tables, which is specified in the rules not to do. But once they reviewed the rules, familiarized themselves with the core components, they enjoyed the playing experience.
3. What kinds of interactions did the players have?
   • The direct interaction between players was racing towards the end of the board. Players would periodically observe the progression of the other player, controlling the pacing of their actions. For example, one of the players were reaching the end of the board, so the opponent started moving the pieces around more frantically. This instilled a rollercoaster of emotion from players, from critical thinking to panic.
4. What confused players?
   • Not much confusion was amongst players, other than the slide puzzle mechanic and the few questions they asked. I think that overall, the confusion lies within tiny unspecified or overlooked rules within the rule sheet.
5. What made players excited?
   • Players were excited based on their thinking capabilities, which reflected based on their performance. They loved the competition against the other opponent and felt a sense of accomplishment knowing they outsmarted their rival. When a player would reach the end of the board, they would eagerly put their pieces in the life raft. In a moment where a player would get stuck in a corner, they would also get excited at solving the problem and progressing.
6. What did your players enjoy doing?
   • Players enjoyed progressing their pieces to the end of the board. They liked the constant flow of movement, providing a quick-paced gameplay. Additionally, they enjoyed flipping the pattern cards over, because it was a charm of randomization.
7. Did any aspect of the game frustrate players?
   • There were two main things about the game that frustrated the players. The first and foremost frustration was the fact that the gameplay was repetitive. The purpose of the pattern cards was to add a sense of randomization to the gameplay. However, in the end, the gray tiles are in the same place every game and the tables can be moved around the randomized patterns, making no difference. The second frustration was that the game was bare bones and could use a spice up. This and the repetitive gameplay go hand-to-hand, urging a sense of touch up.
8. What is your plan to address player questions. Confusion and frustration?
   • In order to address player confusion and frustration, I can add more components to the game. This could add more fun factors that can alter the pacing of the game, or maybe even a sabotaging aspect for the players. Maybe I can find a way to randomize the gray tiles, making each route for the playing experience different. As for any confusion, I plan to tweak the layout of the ruleset. I made sure to add extra pictures to the rules, so player confusion could be reduced majorly. But after realizing there are some things that players still questioned, I can find new ways to emphasize these clarifications in the rules. Maybe new pictures or angles can help…

Game reflections

I think that this game out of all three is my most promising one yet. From the development of this game, I applied my knowledge of slide puzzles into a playable experience between both players. I also like the competitive aspect of my games, which is a reoccurring theme through all three games. I have learned how to balance a lot of luck with skill, implementing mechanics that make an enjoyable playing experience. The only thing that I will do differently next time is make sure to make clarifications on specific game mechanics that might confuse players. A lot of things to take into consideration revolve from the way I word things on my ruleset, so I will have to learn better layouts for pictures and diagrams. A player of my game recommended maybe I add big pieces to the game in a future iteration, which takes up multiple squares on the grid. I can definitely agree on the fact that with future games, I can find new ways to spice up the playing experiences.

So as many of you may know I was preparing a mobile game for the final. Howver due to losing some of my final during the power outage and the remaining of it not working after the power outage. Given the time that I had to start over, I decided that I was going to put a hold on my mobile game for now, and execute a final board game version of the original “Shipping Craze” game. This was just a lot easier for time and sanity sake. However I still wanted to document the mobile game.

I am not gonna go over the whole game documentation because some of it is the same as my last game documentation

Short Summary

This game bring players the enjoyment of the opening package sensation and buying products that they normally wouldn’t buy, without spending their own money. The game is designed that players tap on the box as it comes down the conveyor belt, and they are then rewarded an amount of money that they can later spend at the store for items of their choosing.

Design Process & Thought Process:

• Game Design Document (GDD):Include a concise GDD outlining the game’s core concepts, message/purpose, rules, and mechanics. 

Core Concept:

Shipping Craze is centered around the thrill of unboxing and impulse shopping without real-world consequences. Players tap on packages that travel down a conveyor belt to “open” them and receive in-game currency. This money can then be used to “purchase” a variety of quirky, fun, or aspirational products in a virtual store.

Purpose/Message:

• Deliver the psychological satisfaction of unboxing and collecting.
• Offer a dopamine-boosting reward cycle similar to online shopping.
• Promote mindfulness and stress relief through repetitive tapping and satisfying audio/visual feedback.

Rules:

• Tap boxes as they arrive to earn money.
• Use money to shop for virtual items.
• Collect items to unlock new store categories or limited-edition boxes.
• Avoid missing too many boxes, or a cooldown period may trigger.

Mechanics:

• Conveyor system: Boxes move at increasing speeds.
• Tap interaction: Tapping boxes grants random currency amounts.
• Store system: Purchases are made from a dynamic in-game shop.
• Upgrades: Players can unlock better “gloves”, faster belts, or more valuable boxes.

• Iterative Design: Showcase how you iterated on the game design, highlighting the challenges you faced and the decisions you made. 

 Iterative Design

Development Challenges:

• Pacing Issues: Early versions had too slow a belt, causing players to disengage.
• Store Fatigue: Without variety in store items, players lost interest in spending.

Iterations:

• Introduced tiered box types (e.g., standard, mystery, golden).
• Store refreshes regularly, including themed seasonal content.
• Adjusted tap sensitivity and box speed dynamically as player levels up.

Decision Highlights:

• Prioritized tactile feedback (sound + haptics) after playtesters described tapping as “addictive.”
• Simplified the store layout to reduce cognitive load.

• Game Mechanics: Explain the key game mechanics in detail, using diagrams or screenshots, or photos to illustrate them. 

1. Tapping Boxes
   • Player taps boxes moving left to right.
   • Each tap opens the box with a visual explosion + reward animation.
   • Rare boxes give bonus money or special items.
2. In-Game Currency
   • Accumulates in real-time.
   • Can be used to buy cosmetic or humorous items (e.g., “Gold-plated Pizza Cutter”).
3. The Store
   • Items are sorted into themes (e.g., Kitchen, Fashion, Gadgets).
   • New store categories unlock based on purchase count.
4. Upgrade System
   • Earn passive bonuses (e.g., money per missed box).
   • Visual upgrades to hands/gloves and conveyor aesthetics.

• Player Goals: Clearly define the players’ objectives and how they achieve victory. 

Short-Term:

• Tap and collect money quickly.
• Buy as many quirky products as possible.

Long-Term:

• Unlock all store categories and rare items.
• Upgrade to premium conveyor systems and reach max efficiency.
• Compete on leaderboards or complete item collections.

Victory Condition:

• “Victory” is soft — tied to collection completion or max upgrades.

• Gameplay Sequence: Include images or videos demonstrating different stages of gameplay, highlighting key moments and player interactions. 

1. Startup screen
2. Tapping in action (box explosion animation)
3. Money accumulation feedback
4. In-store browsing and purchase flow
5. Upgrade screen showcasing unlocked features

(I will uplaod Pictures of those I can)

• Game Board & Components: Show good pictures of the game board and components, explaining how they guide or influence player actions. 

Since it’s a digital mobile game:

• The conveyor belt acts as the game board. – I will uplaod screenshots of these later
• Components include:
  • Boxes (standard, rare, themed)
  • Store interface
  • Menu

Rulebook & Playtesting:

• Rulebook Sample: Include a sample of your rulebook, demonstrating your writing and communication skills. 

The rule book is the same as the original one, I never made the mobile modifications.

These would be some changes:

Welcome to Shipping Craze!

Objective:
Tap boxes as they arrive to earn money. Spend your cash on fun virtual products and complete your collection.

How to Play:

• Tap a box as it moves down the conveyor to open it.
• Earn random amounts of money for each box.
• Spend your money in the store to buy items.
• Rare boxes contain bonuses. Don’t miss them!
• Upgrade your tap speed, gloves, and more in the Upgrades menu.

Tips:

• Faster boxes yield higher rewards.
• Complete item sets to unlock bonus features.
• Missing boxes reduces your multiplier — stay sharp!

• Playtesting Notes: Share any notes or feedback from playtesting sessions, showcasing your ability to identify and address issues. 

The mobile game was never fully play tested. However, i had many issues while developinng the game, it was a very large learning curve and there were may things that took me a long time to understand. For example it took me forver to get a working conveyor belt – that used to work prior to my files getting all messed up but no longer works anymore.

• Game Reflections: Discuss what you learned from the development process and what you would do differently next time. 

I learned so much from this process:

• How long it takes to make a game like this
• How hard it is to learn
• How many thing have to be set up in order to make one simple move
• How easy it is to make a mistake
• How long it takes to build a building in Unity, it is not like drawing a picture
• How important it is to keep your files organized.

For the Podcast, I did it on the game ” Gone Home”. Gone Home is a first-person exploration game developed by The Fullbright Company. Set in 1995, you play as Katie Greenbriar, a young woman returning home after a year abroad. When she arrives at her family’s new house in Oregon, she finds it empty and eerily quiet. As Katie, you explore the house to uncover what happened in her absence.

The story unfolds through detailed environmental storytelling—letters, notes, cassette tapes, and personal objects scattered throughout the house. Central to the narrative is Katie’s younger sister, Sam, whose coming-of-age journey, including her struggles with identity, family acceptance, and a romantic relationship, is revealed piece by piece.

Gone Home is often described as a “walking simulator,” with no combat or puzzles—just exploration and emotional discovery. Its strength lies in how it tells a deeply personal and relatable story through atmosphere, subtlety, and a strong sense of time and place.

It will not let me upload my pocast to the actual website because the file is too large. I will try to find a way to add the video!

I recently caved and bought an Xbox, when I haven’t played video games since I was very little. So it has been a bit of a learning curve to say the least. Here are some reviews of the games that I been playing.

Dead Space

1. What was the most frustrating moment or aspect of what you just played? The intensity of the atmosphere made it hard to focus at times, especially when you’re under pressure to react quickly. It was hard to see at some points because it was so dark, so I kept dying at the same spot because I couldn’t find the exit.
2. What was your favorite moment or aspect of what you just played? I loved hearing players react in fear or panic—it added to the immersion and gave the experience a community feel.
3. Was there anything you wnated to do that you couldn’t? Stop dying every two seconds.
4. If you had a magic wand to wave, and you could change, add, or remove anything from the experience, what would it be? I’d want to make sure everyone read the lore entries—they add so much to the culture and backstory.
5. What should be improved with the next version? Nothing
6. Describe the game in 3 words. Intense, Immersive, educational

Roblox

1. What was the most frustrating moment or aspect of what you just played? Trying to pick a game among so many options felt like thinking of countries on the spot—you freeze.
2. What was your favorite moment or aspect of what you just played? Hearing people try to pronounce game names and character terms from different cultures was hilarious.
3. Was there anything you wnated to do that you couldn’t? Nope—this platform is surprisingly limitless.
4. If you had a magic wand to wave, and you could change, add, or remove anything from the experience, what would it be? I’d make the cultural references in some games more visible so newer players appreciate the detail.
5. What should be improved with the next version? Nothing
6. Describe the game in 3 words. Creative, Diverse, Educational

Fortnite

1. What was the most frustrating moment or aspect of what you just played? Landing in a high-traffic area and getting eliminated right away felt like being first to go in a guessing game.
2. What was your favorite moment or aspect of what you just played? Voice chats with players attempting international slang or phrases were the best.
3. Was there anything you wnated to do that you couldn’t? Nope.
4. If you had a magic wand to wave, and you could change, add, or remove anything from the experience, what would it be? I’d highlight cultural emotes or skins so players learn a bit as they play.
5. What should be improved with the next version? Nothing
6. Describe the game in 3 words. Fast, Fun, Educational

City Builder

1. What was the most frustrating moment or aspect of what you just played? Balancing resources and population felt like being forced to think fast, like picking countries under pressure. Honestly, i really struggled to build anything at first because it kept giving errors.
2. What was your favorite moment or aspect of what you just played? Building things
3. Was there anything you wnated to do that you couldn’t? Be able to build from the start instead of really having to figure out what the objective of the game was.
4. If you had a magic wand to wave, and you could change, add, or remove anything from the experience, what would it be? I’d encourage reading about the cultures you’re building around—it gives more meaning to the game.
5. What should be improved with the next version? Nothing
6. Describe the game in 3 words. Strategic, relaxing, educational

Minecraft

1. What was the most frustrating moment or aspect of what you just played? When you’re the first to be attacked by a Creeper—like going first in a tough game.
2. What was your favorite moment or aspect of what you just played? Building my own designs.
3. Was there anything you wnated to do that you couldn’t? Nope this game has everything.
4. If you had a magic wand to wave, and you could change, add, or remove anything from the experience, what would it be? I’d highlight in-game books more—they hold cultural lore that players often skip.
5. What should be improved with the next version? Nothing
6. Describe the game in 3 words. Creative, endless, educational.

NBA 2K25

1. What was the most frustrating moment or aspect of what you just played? Free throws under pressure reminded me of coming up with answers quickly.
2. What was your favorite moment or aspect of what you just played? Other players trying to pronounce international player names always cracked me up.
3. Was there anything you wnated to do that you couldn’t? Nope
4. If you had a magic wand to wave, and you could change, add, or remove anything from the experience, what would it be? Make commentary more educational about different cultures in the league.
5. What should be improved with the next version? Nothing
6. Describe the game in 3 words. Realistic, exciting, educational.

Stardew Valley

1. What was the most frustrating moment or aspect of what you just played? The clock moves fast—it’s like racing to think of an answer first.
2. What was your favorite moment or aspect of what you just played? Building things and cleaning uo my farm.
3. Was there anything you wnated to do that you couldn’t? No, it’s beautifully made.
4. If you had a magic wand to wave, and you could change, add, or remove anything from the experience, what would it be? I’d love more emphasis on cultural festivals in the game.
5. What should be improved with the next version? Nothing
6. Describe the game in 3 words. Peaceful, nostalgic, educational.

Halo

1. What was the most frustrating moment or aspect of what you just played? Being ambushed by enemies out of nowhere—it felt like being the first in a tough question round.
2. What was your favorite moment or aspect of what you just played? Other players trying to mimic alien languages or lore names—classic fun.
3. Was there anything you wnated to do that you couldn’t? No, the game plays well.
4. If you had a magic wand to wave, and you could change, add, or remove anything from the experience, what would it be? I’d make the cultural backstory of each alien race more prominent.
5. What should be improved with the next version? Nothing
6. Describe the game in 3 words. Epic, futuristic, educational.

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II

1. What was the most frustrating moment or aspect of what you just played? Being dropped into combat with no warm-up is tough—feels like being the first to guess under pressure.
2. What was your favorite moment or aspect of what you just played? Just playing and learning how to play.
3. Was there anything you wnated to do that you couldn’t? Nope
4. If you had a magic wand to wave, and you could change, add, or remove anything from the experience, what would it be? Emphasize culture and history behind each mission location more clearly.
5. What should be improved with the next version? Nothing
6. Describe the game in 3 words. Gritty, intense, educational.

Grand Theft Auto V

1. What was the most frustrating moment or aspect of what you just played? Getting chased by the cops too soon is like being tagged first in a game.
2. What was your favorite moment or aspect of what you just played? People trying to say character names or street names from different cultures was fun.
3. Was there anything you wnated to do that you couldn’t? Nope
4. If you had a magic wand to wave, and you could change, add, or remove anything from the experience, what would it be? More insight into the cultural influences behind each neighborhood.
5. What should be improved with the next version? Nothing
6. Describe the game in 3 words. Wild, open, educational.

A Way Out

1. What was the most frustrating moment or aspect of what you just played? Syncing actions with your co-op partner under pressure is like being first to respond in a tense moment.
2. What was your favorite moment or aspect of what you just played? Playing with another person instead of just myself.
3. Was there anything you wnated to do that you couldn’t? Notv really.
4. If you had a magic wand to wave, and you could change, add, or remove anything from the experience, what would it be? I don’t know if I would change anything about the game itself, I think I would also like for it to be a single player game.
5. What should be improved with the next version? Nothing
6. Describe the game in 3 words. Cooperative, fun, exciting

1. What questions did your players have?
   • One of the questions players asked was about the gray tiles. I specified the mechanics of the gray tiles in the rules, but I realize that this is something that I can make more noticeable/clarified. It could have been easily overlooked, causing confusion. The next question that a player asked was how you are supposed to win. More specifically, what the win indicator is. I noticed that some players didn’t know what to do once they reached the end of the board, leaving them to question if they have won. Along with the win indication, a player asked if both characters had to be on the end in order to win.
2. How quickly did they learn to play?
   • Compared to my other games, this one took a bit of time for players to get used to. Players had to get used to the slide puzzle mechanic, which took a game or two for them to be fully comfortable. One player tried to jump over the tables, which is specified in the rules not to do. But once they reviewed the rules, familiarized themselves with the core components, they enjoyed the playing experience.
3. What kinds of interactions did the players have?
   • The direct interaction between players was racing towards the end of the board. Players would periodically observe the progression of the other player, controlling the pacing of their actions. For example, one of the players were reaching the end of the board, so the opponent started moving the pieces around more frantically. This instilled a rollercoaster of emotion from players, from critical thinking to panic.
4. What confused players?
   • Not much confusion was amongst players, other than the slide puzzle mechanic and the few questions they asked. I think that overall, the confusion lies within tiny unspecified or overlooked rules within the rule sheet.
5. What made players excited?
   • Players were excited based on their thinking capabilities, which reflected based on their performance. They loved the competition against the other opponent and felt a sense of accomplishment knowing they outsmarted their rival. When a player would reach the end of the board, they would eagerly put their pieces in the life raft. In a moment where a player would get stuck in a corner, they would also get excited at solving the problem and progressing.
6. What did your players enjoy doing?
   • Players enjoyed progressing their pieces to the end of the board. They liked the constant flow of movement, providing a quick-paced gameplay. Additionally, they enjoyed flipping the pattern cards over, because it was a charm of randomization.
7. Did any aspect of the game frustrate players?
   • There were two main things about the game that frustrated the players. The first and foremost frustration was the fact that the gameplay was repetitive. The purpose of the pattern cards was to add a sense of randomization to the gameplay. However, in the end, the gray tiles are in the same place every game and the tables can be moved around the randomized patterns, making no difference. The second frustration was that the game was bare bones and could use a spice up. This and the repetitive gameplay go hand-to-hand, urging a sense of touch up.
8. What is your plan to address player questions. Confusion and frustration?
   • In order to address player confusion and frustration, I can add more components to the game. This could add more fun factors that can alter the pacing of the game, or maybe even a sabotaging aspect for the players. Maybe I can find a way to randomize the gray tiles, making each route for the playing experience different. As for any confusion, I plan to tweak the layout of the ruleset. I made sure to add extra pictures to the rules, so player confusion could be reduced majorly. But after realizing there are some things that players still questioned, I can find new ways to emphasize these clarifications in the rules. Maybe new pictures or angles can help…