Week 1-Game Design Questions_Meredith B

  1. In your opinion what should every game have? Why do you like your favorite game?
    • Every game needs a good premise with a replayability aspect. No matter how fun the game is, if I cannot play it multiple times and face the same amount of enjoyment, I will not play it anymore/actively. Currently Phasmophobia (https://store.steampowered.com/app/739630/Phasmophobia ←Heres the steam link, also on playstation). I enjoy it as a horror game, and the mechanics of the game allows for infinite replayability. It is essentially a ghost hunting game, where you find the ghost, or it finds you. There is 7 parts of evidence, over 20 ghosts and 10 maps,challenge and custom gamemodes, and each round is never the same. There is also a level and prestige system, so it encourages players to keep going, even if they have “beat” the game. (The game was released in 2020/2021, and still active and being played, we had 2 updated maps and a huge game change released a few months ago, so it is still a popular/updated game).
  2. List the games you’ve played and currently play.
    • Mobile:
      Good Pizza/Great Pizza
      Block Blast
      Plato
      The Way Home
      Super Phantom Cat 1 and 2
    • PC:
      Phasmophobia (Favorite Game ATM)
      Valorant
      Genshin Impact
      Keep Talking and Nobody Explodes
      Content Warning
      Lethal Company
      Slime Rancher 1 and 2
      Minecraft
      Roblox
    • Nintendo:
      Mario Kart
      Animal Crossing: New Horizons
      AK-Axolotl
    • Tabletop/Other
      Uno
      Cards Against Humanity
      Old Maid
      Tag
      Spoons
  3. Can you apply the three act structure to your favorite game? What is it’s pacing and how long do you find yourself in each act?
    • The 3 act structure does not fully apply to my favorite game, since sections of the act can be avoided. The 3 act would be beginning (finding/locating the ghost), middle (getting evidence) and end, (ghost “hunts” and deciding on what the ghost is). However there are moments in the game where you walk in and immediately know what the ghost is due to an ability, or you walk in and immediately die (That’s an achievement actually). So there’s always a chance to avoid the 3 act structure within the game. In general, the 1st act, of finding the ghost, takes the longest due to the need of exploring the map. The 3rd act, specifically the hunting part, doesn’t really happen if you play the game correctly and are smart with your resources.
  4. When coming up with ideas where do you find you start, with the metaphor or the mechanic?
    • The mechanic, it’s harder to come up with the way to play the game rather than the visuals for me. I would rather have the premise and design of the game fully developed before focusing on visuals, as visuals are easier to test and change rather than set game mechanics.

Game Response Questions (Vanilla Fluxx)- Harmony Jablon

Game Response Questions

Was it fun? 

  • Yes, in my opinion I thought the game was enjoyable, but me and my group played three different versions of the game and around halfway through the second game we were mentally clocked out. I think it is overall enjoyable, but I wouldn’t play it more than once in one sitting. 

What were the player interactions?

  • Even though the whole game is pretty much player interactions, I felt direct interactions were actions like exchanging hands with each other, picking a card from a player’s hand, and swapping each other’s “keepers.”

How long did it take to learn?

  • It took about 3-4 cycles around to finally get the idea of the game, and the different cards. But throughout the game occasionally we did have to stop and ask questions or read the directions over again. 

What was the most frustrating moment or aspect of what you just played?

  • The most frustrating part of the game was keeping track of all the new rules, and figuring out which cards canceled each other out. Some were also unclear to understand directions what the player(s) were supposed to do with the new rule cards. 

What was your favorite moment or aspect of what you just played?

  • My favorite moment was the action cards to switch hands with other players. This was my favorite aspect because it created more interactions between players, and made everyone become a little more competitive with each other. 

Was there anything you wanted to do that you couldn’t?

  • I wanted to keep certain cards in my hand even though there would be a card restriction on how many cards you could hold. Having to play them all was frustrating especially when I wanted to strategically keep/use certain cards. 

If you had a magic wand to wave, and you could change, add, or remove anything from the experience, what would it be?

  • If I could change anything about the game it would be how many new rule cards we can have on the table at once throughout the whole game. Due to confusion I think having a restriction of only up to four new rule cards at a time would make the game a little easier to play and keep track of. 

Is this a game you would play again? Yes _____ No ______ Why

  • Yes, because I enjoyed the unknown or chance aspect of the game with the addition of strategy of how to play your cards. I am also a competitive person, so I liked how competitive the game could become.

(8/28/25_Meredith B) Game Test: Fluxx

Play: Fluxx

  1. Was it fun? Kinda? Some parts were annoying to learn, and the game overall wasn’t too bad, mostly just a big thing of confusion.
  2. What were the player interactions? Yes, but lots of it was just explaining rules/cards and the confusion behind it
  3. How long did it take to learn? About 5 minutes to fully understand. However since the rules kept changing due to the gameplay mechanic, the game is always changed, hence constant learning.
  4. What was the most frustrating moment or aspect of what you just played? The constant changing of rules made the game mostly confusing due to the exceptions and changes being made all of the time. Almost every turn changes the rules, making the game change constantly, which I personally don’t find fun.
  5. What was your favorite moment or aspect of what you just played? Nothing in particular honestly, due to the nature of the game it personally felt very mundane the whole time.
  6. Was there anything you wanted to do that you couldn’t? Honestly I would want to keep the rules the same, the changing of goals is cool, but the rules changes are confusing.
  7. If you had a magic wand to wave, and you could change, add, or remove anything from the experience, what would it be? Remove the rules cards, as much as they impact the game, I would make it so you pick the rules, but it can’t constantly change. It would still allow for the weird rules as an option, but would make it a little more understandable.
  8. Is this a game you would play again? Not really, it’s not engaging and a little too confusing for me, especially for the constant rule changing for me to find enjoyable.

‘Fraudocracy!’ by Dillon DeSantis

‘Fraudocracy!’ is a one-on-one political satire card game where players use characters with influence hijack parties and rig power structures. It targets fans of games with social commentary. The game uses 3D-printed tiles, each representing a societal figure and containing directional spike values that dictate their individual ‘influence’. It depends not only on which tiles (characters) you get but also how you play them (offensively or defensively). The person with the most power over a party (purple or green) wins. Through its mechanics, the game satirizes how institutional power is often less about who you are and more about how you position yourself—rewarding manipulation, betrayal, and opportunism as viable paths to dominance.

Over Winter Break, I hyper-fixated on the old game franchise ‘Skylanders’. Within 6 of their games, 5 of them feature a minigame called ‘Skystones’. Stones are based on previously defeated in-game enemies, and feature various spike values encompassing them to represent how much damage they do to adjacent stones. I knew I wanted to make something for Game Design using this concept.

The political portion of the game is more of a manifestation of my emotions than an intentional decision. Not that I regret making this game per say – I don’t – but I most likely would have gone with a different theme had there not been political… ‘events’… that transpired during the start of the semester. I’ve been sitting here for like 30 minutes trying to figure out how to word this section, but I’m sure we all know what I’m referring to.

The first challenge was figuring out how to convey dynamic ownership of a card. In a round of Skystones, one card may have its color changed several times, and I wanted to remain faithful to that. The prototype used double-sided index cards with a “Corrupt” (Bad) side and an “Altruist” (Good) side. The spikes were represented with numeric values. I initially wanted 2 designs for each character – one for each side – and require players to flip cards whenever they gained ownership of them.

The first playtest revealed this wouldn’t be a viable mechanic because, not only did it take extremely long to do each time, it was also difficult to do when cards were placed next to each other. I needed to figure out a new way to represent ownership.

After a lot of thought and discussion, I concluded I’d make additional ‘frame’ pieces to magnetically attach to the cards. This change had the unintentional benefit of making the game even more faithful to its inspiration, as Skystones have a colored outline around them.

So I had a decent idea for a game, that’s good; but how do I even make these pieces? The biggest problem was my desire to make them weighted – something paper/cardboard/posterboard is not. It wasn’t until one class whenever Reese asked me to playtest his game, Invasion, which had used 3D printed pieces. I immediately knew I wanted to do the same, completely ignoring the fact I had never used one or anything remotely similar. I used a browser-based modeling software called Tinkercad to create my first model:

I printed the frame too large. But it’s a start! In fact, it felt weirdly invigorating. If you like cool gadgets and gizmos, I highly recommend watching a 3D printer work in real time; It’s absolutely fascinating. A bit of tweaking and a few days later, I printed my next rendition, this time with a correctly sized frame:

Things were going well! I posted this in a discord server, and a few people were quick to ask “why didn’t you just make a snap-fit piece?”; and with some help from an online friend who knows Blender, they edited my model to integrate a snap-fit frame, saving me money on the originally planned magnets.

Things were going well! The next step was to make about 20 more, each with different spike values. Unfortunately though, Tinkercad wasn’t well-suited for such a project. I briefly tried to teach myself Blender and Blockbench, but gave up quickly. I had hit a roadblock, and on top of that, I got busy with other classes and began to stagnate.

A few weeks later, Professor Ames helped me get the ball rolling again during class. I was busy worrying about the weight or thickness of my piece, and stressed about the process of finishing the game. Ames took my model, shrunk it, filled the bed with copies, and printed 16 tiny prototype pieces. I was honestly confused and reluctant, but I let him do his thing; and in a few hours, they were done:

By printing these, Professor Ames was finally (better late than never) help me understand the importance of looking past aesthetic and focusing on mechanics when in the designing stage. This was eye-opening for me, and unfortunately I cannot effectively communicate the impact at 3am.

With newfound motivation, I jumped in a call with another (different) online friend. He works full-time as an engineer, so being proficient in Fusion360, he was able to help me significantly improve my model. He rounded the spikes and corners, aligned the frame with the piece, sloped the spikes, and so much more. My project was finally starting to feel like a real game.

Next, I needed to make 20 cards with different values, so that my friend could model them with the correct spike amounts. I created a spreadsheet with various figures within society to use for the roster. I needed to design their spike values based on how much ‘influence’ that person has in real life. For example, an Editor has more influence (spikes) than a Protester due to their power to alter the narrative.

A lot of this is going to be a retelling of a long interaction between myself and my friend.
He then sent me the models, and I begun printing them on 2 printers at a time.

While these were printing, I was in the lab working on the instruction manual for the game. I took a new approach, and rather than designing it in Microsoft Word like I did with my previous games (for some reason) – I designed it in Adobe Illustrator. I was able to convert a piece file into a topographic image, and use that to incorporate a visual informative guide. I had a ton of fun and was incredibly happy with the result.

I continued until I had all 20 pieces, and left campus at around 11:30pm that WEDNESDAY NIGHT. WHY DO I ALWAYS DO THIS TO MYSELF ITS 4AM CLASS IS IN 4 HOURS. ahem. anyways. Despite saying I learned about prioritizing mechanics over aesthetics, I didn’t – and then proceeded to work on spray painting my pieces until 2am.

Here’s one of my cats Charlie watching me (he’s very cute):

I can confidentially say this was one of the TWO times in my ENTIRE LIFE that I went to bed feeling excited for school; and the second playtest begun in class the next morning. I wasn’t able to create the character portraits at that time, so I temporarily used sticky notes to convey which figure each card represented. I also had to create a temporary playing board/grid out of cardboard, as players would often misperceive them as puzzle pieces and try to connect them.

We played a few rounds, and I gained a LOT of insight into my game. Most importantly though, I needed a way to hide cards from your opponent, or limit the players hand. Flipping them over didn’t work, since the spikes allowed for players to intentionally leave bad cards for the other player. They were too big and there were too many to hold all 9 in one hand, so we needed something else to hold or hide the cards. Professor Ames gave me the idea to create a machine of sorts which would conceal upcoming cards from the player. I went back to the drawing board, and came up with this:

This was shaping up to be one of my all-time favorite projects, but I still needed the actual characters for the cards. I measured my pieces, opened an Illustrator file, and started shamefully AI-generating portraits for them. I told it to generate characters in an Monopoly/Fallout76 art style, and I can’t say it didn’t deliver.

This stage of the design put the cards through many changes, mostly in name and style.

I printed 2 copies, laminated one, and then cut them out. They fit perfectly, and it was incredibly exciting to start seeing my game properly come to fruition.

Next was the card dispenser. Another call with my friend later, I had one designed; but it had one major problem: it took 18 hours to print.

While that was printing, I headed to class for the 3rd playtest.

Playtest 3 was the most popular (for lack of a better term) playtest. After watching several games unfold, it quickly became clear that the corrupt cards were incredibly overpowered, and desperately needed a nerf.

I had become fully invested, and at this point, I was ordering my own spools of textured filament online to use for my final print. But I needed to go check on my tower print.

It worked, but it also didn’t. On one hand, it printed with very few visual issues, which surprised me. Unfortunately, on the other hand, the measurements and model could’ve been better.

The tube was too wide, which allowed for cards to flip or rotate when they were dropped in. The ramp was not steep enough, meaning cards didn’t slide down to the output slot; which was too low, meaning cards got stuck. As much as I was dreading it, I needed to edit the model and print a new one.

And then I procrastinated and jeopardized the quality of my game. This was quite literally the last picture I took, because I never finished. I printed a few of the final pieces with a marble textured filament, and the frames with holographic filament. I started printing my new tower, which with some tweaking, I was able to shave the print time to 10 hours; except I started too late. I quite literally fumbled the bag, and I had no good excuse.

I learned A LOT from this project. I learned how to use a 3D printer, general maintenance as well as how to load/unload filament; I learned about models, their innerworkings, and several methods of saving time by cutting corners; I learned about the concept of tolerance/clearance, and I was reminded that millimeters exist; I used spray paint for the first time, and set a record for the longest I’ve ever stayed up for a school project; There was probably a lot more that I’m struggling to recall on 3 hours of sleep. I wish I could say this experience taught me not to procrastinate, but I can’t imagine myself ever changing.

Late Week 7 Response Dillon DeSantis

What are the challenges a team faces when working on an educational game?
Designing an educational game involves balancing the goals of different experts. Game designers want fun and interactivity, pedagogy experts care about effective learning, and content experts focus on accuracy. Each discipline speaks its own “language,” which makes collaboration difficult. The biggest challenge is finding a way to meet all these needs without compromising the game’s overall quality or purpose.

In the case study, team members vetoed each other’s game ideas. What were the scientist’s, pedagogy expert’s, and designer’s issues?
The scientist rejected game ideas that didn’t align with real science or used inaccurate information. The pedagogy expert opposed game levels that could block students from accessing educational content and later criticized replayability when it led to uneven learning experiences. Meanwhile, the game designer dismissed ideas from the other two because they didn’t feel like “real games” or lacked compelling gameplay. Each expert was stuck in their own perspective, making it hard to agree on a shared direction.

What did the team learn from playtesting their prototypes?
Playtesting showed that some of their assumptions didn’t match how players actually behaved, as well as led to major changes in the game’s structure, pacing, and content delivery. For example, players weren’t as interested in reading detailed content as expected, so the team simplified and made it more visible. It also helped them see how different player types responded to the game, especially the differences in how male and female players engaged with it.

How does playtesting resolve conflicts among team members?
Playtesting moves the conversation away from theory and into real evidence. Instead of arguing about what might or could work, the team can observe what actually happens when people play the game. It forces team members to confront whether their ideas hold up in practice, and this helps everyone make decisions based on what improves the player’s experience. Ultimately, it shifts focus from individual opinions to shared outcomes.

Game Design 2 Class Game Test

What was the most frustrating aspect? Not understanding how my game multipliers affected my score.

What was your favorite moment? Playtesting ( I really like Hues n Cues)

Was there anything you wanted to do?  Maybe points for perceived time invested in game prototypes. I’ve played prototypes that have a huge amount of thought, time, and resources invested. This might already exist.

If I had a magic wand to change, add or remove? Maybe differentiation from Game Design 1. It feels very similar in layout in lectures, projects, and outcome and not sure how much additional information I gained from an educational perspective.

If this game scoring is kept for future classes, it would be cool to have the score on a website. It could show what multipliers you have and how it effects your score.

What should be improved? I feel like the complexity of certain games versus others isn’t taken into consideration with the final prototype scoring system. I could be wrong, but it seems like a simple card game and a very complex coded game would get the same score. The way it’s currently set up, I feel like it’s encouraging producing quick, easy games. Specifically for a games for change class, it becomes harder to produce impactful, polished, or researched games.

Game Message? Iteration is king. You must test your ideas, get feedback, and provide feedback.

Game in 3 words? experimental, creative, prototypes

Dot’s Home Game Review

What was the most frustrating aspect? The players had very few choices. There was little guidance or motivation to finish.

What was your favorite moment? Finding the wallet. it was a moment where the user actually can interact with elements of the game. you could move parts of the wallet around to see family pictures.

Was there anything you wanted to do? I really wanted to do more things in this game. It really was just a click through choose your own story game. I wanted puzzles or more interactive elements of consequence.

If I had a magic wand to change, add or remove? More interactions. Perhaps elements that will help enhance the time you travel back to? When traveling to the 1950s, it would be nice if there was a radio that would play music from the time period. There was a street that players could walk down but there wasn’t really anything to interact with.

What should be improved? More interactions as said. I think it would attract more people to play the game.

Game Message? 1. Individual choices could effect your family for generations. 2. Effects of race on the real estate market since thee 1950s.

Game in 3 words? real-estate, racial awareness, family heritage

Barrel of Truth Version 2 Rules -Colin Kenny

All players are given a pen and piece of paper per round. On their turn, players draw a card and read it aloud to the group, as well as its category, either public or anonymous. If public, all players write their names in the corner of their paper. If anonymous, players should only write their answers. Once everyone is finished, they drop their papers into the barrel, the card drawer closes the lid, shakes it well, then removes the lid and reads all of the responses. Then, players are encouraged to discuss and have meaningful conversations regarding the topic and responses. Play continues clockwise. Play ends when players feel they know each other much better.

Rules for Barrel of Truth (Version 1)- Colin Kenny

Each player is given a Sharpie or any type of pen, but all of them must be identical. Each round, the host (me) hands each player a slip of paper and asks them to respond to a question or prompt pertaining to the other players. It can be in the form of an assumption, and opinion, a secret, etc. No direction is given whether the responses SHOULD be positive or negative. Some rounds will require players to write their own names on their slips along with their answers, other round they must be completely anonymous. After every player has answered, they will put their slip in the barrel, the barrel is closed and mixed, and each answer is read aloud by the host. The players are suggested to share thoughts and feelings of the responses. Once everyone is ready, the next round begins. The game ends whenever the players either hate each other or get bored.